The Government down under offered vax passport travel early if vaxed!
Travel where? When the virus is everywhere? Travel even it is known THE VAX COULD NOT PREVENT ONE BEING INFECTED AS THE MEDIA REPORTED? ISN’T THIS PRAWN HEAD PROMISERY NOTE TO TRAVEL?
Why so foolishly courting death to the innocent guy hogging him to get vax?
IS THIS PROPER MEDICAL ETHICS?
WHERE IS THE DIGNITY OF PROFESSIONAL MEDICINE?
ABC raised this question most recently after FIVE BLOOD CLOT CASES WERE REPORTED SOON AFTER RESUMPTION OF AZ VAX JABS IN DOWN UNDER? NO ANSWER?
In one case earlier to this it was reported that the cause of death would be investigated under a coroner inquiry. So far no news. This would be good. The death would not have happened if the person had not taken the vax jab. Death from an infected case was different as the normal case of contracted the virus. The death after vax jab from adverse side effect uncalled for!
The vax mfg n vax agent convincing the vax safe with statistics n “benefits outweight risks” should be arrested n charged for the cause of deaths!
Not misleading hogging of VAX SALESMANSHIP!
The initial success of vax jab was also hogged by the vax rep but leaving out the combinatorial use of vax n SOPs as the Israel officials put it!
Most recently a guy hogging for vax published a beautiful virus flattening curve among a few still fluctuating cutves and claimed that vax did the job. Just then UK PM announced he would further relax some restrictions from the several months of lockdown!
Words, words, n words . . .
FAKE, FAKE, N FAKE . . .
Fact checks, fact checks, fact checks . . .
When one does not agree with
What is said, shout it is FAKE!
So easy to do that! And that is taken in!
An example, a man was given a report to read n vet. He was later asked what did he think?
The man said, “The explanation is consistent with the data presented.” Quick SHOT back, “It is FAKE!”
The man replied, “IF YOU WANT ME TO SAY FAKE, I MUST HAVE PROOF!”
Someone was given the range of possible side effects of a vax n he sent to FACT CHECKS n paid for it. Bounced back the answer within seconds NO SUCH EFFECTS. He was happy!
Could it be?
A cardio was asked by a patient whether he could take the vax jab! Out shot the answer, YES, the statistics say so, “Benefits outweigh risks” n next the media reported vax jab caused more blood clots globally!
Fact checks by patient with a cardio centre in a large city that handled large cases said cardio patients with enlarged organs or body parts should not take the vax jab. Last n most common the patient had already had allergy before! This was not fact check by the cardio.
THE WEIRD WORLD OF HOGGING AROUND TRUTHS N FAKES!
Being a CHEVALIER, tho not great, my FRENCH involvement in research work in Solar Cell in Toulouse CNRS LAB in 1980s, under DR ESTEEVE, the Director n DR MARFAING, Professor n Director of PARIS CNRS LAB I am happy to learn last night from ABC the French discovery using conventional vax method that is trusted n safer.
The vax is on final clinical run in UK n EU. Confident of the French meticulous researh work I trust the world would get a better deal in vax safety than “BENEFITS OUTWEIGHS RISKS” WITH SO MANY ACCOMPANIED ADVERSE EFFECTS OF BLOOD CLOTS THE MEDIA REPORTED IN THE AZ VAX.
The country of origin of AZ VAX REPORTED TO HAVE ORDERED 100 MILLION DOSES VAX NOW IN THE FINAL TRIAL IN UK!
Tho confident I shall wait n see the results especially what adverse effects.
“The taste in the French pie is in the eating of it. “
Chevalier des Palms Academique Dr.Donald Chuah Penang MALAYSIA
Associate Professor PHYSICS
USM (MALAYSIA)
(RETIRED 1991)
CPhys MInstP
Consultant Physicist
Being radiactive what is its half-life? This is important to its duration of survival n spreading Being radioactive it would mutate faster! Is that the results of the fast new variants that caused the rapid resurgence in India? N most feared now?
Quote from ABC
A GOOD QUSTION!
Australians showed a sense of good responsibility now they had most recently 5 blood clot cases!
DOES THE POPULAR SLOGAN “BENEFITS OUTWEIGH RISKS” SUPPOSEDLY COVER THIS?
AND GET AWAY SCOTT FREE?
This would tantamount to second degree of murder or ” homicide” should death be a consequence!
In the early days of the outbreak taking nutrients to strengthen the immune system n also in the hospital treatment was mentioned. The current vaccines are said to produce the nutrients in situ to fight n “kill” the virus.
ARE BOTH WAYS OF NUTRIENTS INTRODUCING THE SAME THO THE VAX WAY IS OF COURSE MUCH FASTER BEING IN SITU. SHOULD NOT BOTH NUTRIENTS FUNCTION THE SAME?
THE BLOOD THINNING OF ASPIRIN IS A CLEAR UNDERSTANDING TO PREVENT BLOOD CLOT WHICH KILLS THE COVID -19 PATIENT.
ANY INPUT FROM THE MEDICAL EXPERTS TO A LAYMAN UNSTANDING SEEKING A SIMPLE SAFER SOLUTION.
donaldchuah.photo.com 